dc.contributor.author | Amiry, Sughra | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-12-11T07:44:18Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-12-11T07:44:18Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/89 | |
dc.description.abstract | This paper examines a theoretical explanation answering the puzzle: Why do some
post-conflict countries have higher economic perception1 than others? Taking a mix method
approach, the study contends that having an election positively increases people’s economic
activities because it gives them a positive foresight about country’s future condition.
Moreover, the study argues that self-administered election increases people’s economic
activities than foreign-imposed election. This is because neither foreign-imposed nor self-
administered elections are as transparent as they should be. However, due to weak political
institution, the corruption involved during self-administered election can easily be released to
the public. That is the time when the people do not stay indifference; rather they have a
stronger sense of ownership over the election claiming for fair count of their votes. This gives
them more confidence in the new government because they believe their votes can bring an
accountable government to the power, which is capable of providing security and business
facilities. Once the people are assured that their wealth will be well protected, they are more
likely to expand their financial investments. Eventually, these micro-level investments would
contribute in macro-level economic improvement. Quantitatively I test this assertion in cross-
post-conflict countries that have had any election within 15 years after the end year of the
conflict. I use data from Mullenbach dataset regarding presence of peacekeeping mission to
create dummy variables for foreign-imposed vs. self-administered election. The World
Bank’s several economic indicators are used to gauge the dependent variable: economic
activities. I also supplement my findings with qualitative fieldwork in Afghanistan to explain
how influential the election and the idea of who administers the election in post-conflict
context could be on people’s economic activities. | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | Submitted By:Sughra Amiry
Advisor:Professor Emily Stull
30/04/2015 | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.publisher | Asian University for Women, Chittagong, Bangladesh | en_US |
dc.subject | Political Stability, Economic Activities, Post-Conflict Countries | en_US |
dc.title | Foreign-Imposed vs. Self-Administered Elections and People’s Economic Perceptions in Post-Conflict Contexts | en_US |
dc.type | Thesis | en_US |