Global health is more than just ‘Public Health Somewhere Else’
dc.contributor.author | Alam, Nazmul | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-08-12T11:07:39Z | |
dc.date.available | 2025-08-12T11:07:39Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
dc.identifier.uri | repository.auw.edu.bd:8080//handle/123456789/1178 | |
dc.description.abstract | ► Global health can be anywhere as it often focuses on large-scale health inequities that are rooted in transnational determinants. ► Some global health initiatives and actors aim to find solutions to domestic problems. ► King and Koski’s definition of global health may exacerbate inequities by reserving the right to call oneself a global health researcher to those who are privileged and have access to funding that enables them to travel to other settings. ► An inadequate definition of global health based on a ‘here’ vs ‘somewhere else’ dichotomy could result in less funding for a field already characterised by limited resources. ► The decolonisation of global health requires promot- ing and valuing reflexivity, critical approaches, equi- table partnerships and accountability. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | BMJ Global Health | en_US |
dc.title | Global health is more than just ‘Public Health Somewhere Else’ | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
-
2020 [6]